⚖️

    Averocity

    Collective Decision-Making Engine

    What It Does

    Measures the quality of group decisions — not just speed or consensus — by weighting input by the contributor's proven track record.

    How It Works

    When a team votes or discusses, Averocity tracks not just who spoke, but what they've contributed before. High-impact contributors carry more weight. Biases are flagged. Rushed decisions are paused.

    Who It's For

    DAOs, startup leadership teams, research panels, and boards that make high-stakes decisions — but often default to the loudest voice.

    Key Features

    • Dynamic weighting based on verifiable past contributions
    • Flags confirmation bias, groupthink, and dominance patterns
    • Requires evidence for high-impact proposals
    • Outputs a 'Decision Health Score'

    Built For

    Groups that want to make better decisions — not just faster ones.

    Connects With

    EpistediaPulls in the knowledge used to support each proposal.
    CapsliceRewards contributors whose ideas lead to successful outcomes.

    Tags

    GovernanceDecision ScienceMerit-Based Voting