⚖️
Averocity
Collective Decision-Making Engine
What It Does
Measures the quality of group decisions — not just speed or consensus — by weighting input by the contributor's proven track record.
How It Works
When a team votes or discusses, Averocity tracks not just who spoke, but what they've contributed before. High-impact contributors carry more weight. Biases are flagged. Rushed decisions are paused.
Who It's For
DAOs, startup leadership teams, research panels, and boards that make high-stakes decisions — but often default to the loudest voice.
Key Features
- •Dynamic weighting based on verifiable past contributions
- •Flags confirmation bias, groupthink, and dominance patterns
- •Requires evidence for high-impact proposals
- •Outputs a 'Decision Health Score'
Built For
Groups that want to make better decisions — not just faster ones.
Connects With
Epistedia — Pulls in the knowledge used to support each proposal.
Capslice — Rewards contributors whose ideas lead to successful outcomes.
Tags
GovernanceDecision ScienceMerit-Based Voting